Why do companies regulate financial reporting?
Get assignment help for this at
assignment4finance@gmail.com
Why regulate?
It can be said that companies are separate legal
entity from its owners who are the shareholders. The company is therefore
accountable t these group of people called shareholders. They also have
maintain a lasting relation with the bank who are the fund suppliers to the
company and an important user of the financial report. Other entities are also
users of the financial statement which are employee, the public and the
government. Therefore it is required that companies produce it financial
statement to meet the regulatory requirement and also to meet the needs of its
users. The Companies Act also requires companies on formation to company with
the period financial reporting requirements. (need to find reference). For the
reason that company has to produces information of various user, it therefore
has to be consistent with the regulation accounting standards.
The report now discusses the accounting treatment of
defined benefit under IAS 19,financial reporting issues in the debate, assess
the current requirement of the IAS 19 Employment Benefits in relations to
defined benefit plan, determining the amount to be expensed to a company’s
financial statements for the cost of a defined benefit.
DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN
Employee benefits are classified into two categories;
short-term employee benefits and long-term employee benefits. Pension benefit
is a long-term employee benefit and is the most important out of all. The
pension systems is then broken down into three types namely state pensions,
pension received from employee resulting from employment contract and
individual pension saving plans. The state pension is provided by the
government as well as the payment and it is based on number of qualifying years
gained through the National Insurance contributions paid. Individual pension
plan involves making a personal contribution apart from state and companies
which provides a regular source of income in the future after retirement. The
focus would be on the second type of pension, “Pension received from employee
that is company pension” (Alexandra)
Company pension is an agreement between the employee
and the employer on signing a contract over a period of time for the employer
to give some form of pay benefit after retirement. This plan is known as the
defined benefit plan. The employee does not get to know how much would be paid
until retirements. The contributions made are over the period of employee
contract with the company and it is usually made to a different entity as a
form of investment to receive a later return.
Defined benefit plans are those plans where the
benefits are guaranteed amounts. Employee make contribution to towards benefit
plan which is the amounts employee are paid as at retirement which determined
by reference to a formula with is in compliance to the accounting standard
adopted. Under the defined benefit plan, a number of factors are considered
when determining the formula such as employees’ earnings or salaries, age,
length of service and compensation. Consequently, the expense recognised for a defined
benefit plan is not necessarily the amount of the contribution due for the
period. (IAS 19)
With the defined benefit plans, it may either be
unfunded, or wholly or partly funded by contributions made by an entity, and
sometimes its employees, into an entity, or fund, that is legally separate from
the reporting entity and from which the employee benefits are paid. Company not
only reveal its financial position and investment performance of the find when
determining funded benefits but also put into consideration its ability and
willingness to make good and shortfall in fund’s assets. This therefore
facilitates entity to assess its actuarial and investment associated with the
benefit plan.
“The employer retains the actuarial and investment
risk plan” (ACCA Global). Therefore if a company does not make ensure
contribution towards an employee pension, upon retirement, the employee would
still receive its full entitled which thereby has negative effects on this
profits statement and balance. It has been said that companies are recently
have problems in pension regulatory requirement.
Accounting for Pension plan under IAS 19 Benefit plan
requirement
The accounting for pension plan requires that the
“amount recognised in the balance sheet should be the present value of he
expected future payment required after the employee year of service of
contract.” The present values are therefore determined using the “Projected
Unit Credit Method” [IAS 19.54-64]. The value of any plan asset should be
carried out on a regular based to ensure the amount recognised in the financial
statement does not differ from those that would be determined at the balance
sheet date. This valuation should be unbiased and also meet with the
compatibility requirements of financial statement. [IAS 19.102-104].
Reliability - important
“Actuarial profits and losses gain and losses are
determined by the expected return on plan assets and the realized return on
plan asset“. [IAS 19.92-93]. If the gain realised is more than the expected
return than it is an actuarial profits whereas if the return realised is lesser
than expected return then it is an actuarial loss. IAS 19 allows “the Corridor
approach”, unrealised gains and looses balance which exceeds 10% does not need
to be accounted for. This would help reduces the impact it have on the
financial statement. On the other hand, deferring the recognition of gains or
losses could lead to producing misleading figure which therefore affects
comparability of the financial statement.
3) The critical factors are thus the retirement
benefits that are fixed or determinable, without regards to the adequacy of
assets that may have been set aside for payment of the benefits. (Wiley IFRS
workbook and Guide) - importanthis
essay is a
Past service cost is “recognised immediately and on a
straight line basis over the average period until the amended benefit becomes
vested“. These costs occurred before the defined benefit plan was introduced
[IAS 19.96-101]. Gains and losses that occurs as a result of “curtailments and settlements”
is required to be recognised when the “curtailments and settlement” occurs [IAS
19.109-115]
KEY ISSUES IN THE DEBATE – EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
Why are companies facing such problem with the pension
plan? The approach used by companies in determining amount to be expensed in
their financial statement is one of the most areas of concern for companies
employing the IAS 19. This may include the approach taken by companies in
reflecting the figures. The accounting for pension under IAS 19 pointed out early
discusses the procedures or approach to be taking when calculating the amount
to be recognised.
Companies’ treatment of this figure whether as a one
off payment or ongoing (accumulate over the employee year of service). The IAS
19 employee benefit requires the accounting and disclosure of the employed
benefit. The accounting standard requires that companies recognise the cost of
providing employee benefits in the period the benefits are earned by the
employee, rather than when it is paid or payables (Deliottes). Reflecting these
benefits figures over a period would reduce the huge impact it would have had
on companies’ financial statement if it was to be reflected when the benefit
was actually realised.
A number of companies and commentators have been recently
reported lastly that the Pension plan is have violent on effects on the
companies’ balance sheet. Therefore Companies’ wants to take significant
measure in other gains back its financial strength. Therefore they are
considering closing the pension plan or reduction in the pension plan and other
alternatives. A survey was carried out be defined benefit executives and in
their findings, “Forty-four percent reported that defined benefit plan plan’s
performance in the past year has substantially affected their company’s overall
financial performance”. It pointed out that more than half of this group of
companies are having a rethink about the plan and only a few are ready to
terminate the plan.
No matter what recognition procedure used, the pension
plan is bound to have an impact on the company as it is a cash outflow out of
the organisation. This therefore becomes a cost burden upon the company on the
other hand; companies can take investment measure which produces a positive
return. This return therefore could be used to pay for the pension benefit. The
pension plan is also seen as accrue which the employee had delivered services
or finished contract. At this point, the employee owes the employee a certain
amount which is determined on various factors discussed earlier.
IAS 19 pointed out the accounting procedure but failed
to look in the companies’ ability for meet up with the funding. It also does
not allow that much disclose the risk associated with funding pension scheme.
The company’s ability to fund the plan decided whether or not it would have a
negative or positive impact on this financial statement. Also companies should
be taking reasonable investment measure to fund this pension plan.
ANALYSIS
What does the IAS 19 says/ IAS requirements? Approach
to reporting… (Assessing current requirements of IAS 19 employee benefits in
relations to:
· Defined benefits plans
· The context of the IASB’s framework for the
presentation and preparation of financial statements as a theory of financial
accounting.
PROS
(1) Retentions of employee, the pension plan attract
employee
(2) compliance with the regulatory standard would
attract future investors as the financial statement ensure comparability
(3) One of the objectives essences of a financial
reporting is the comparability with other companies and decision useful.
Companies complying with the IAS 19 would ensure reporting is done the same
where which makes financial statement more useful and increased comparability.
Producing various financial reports would not make the information useful for
investor as they would not be able to compare financial statement since the
same regulatory requirements were not followed.
The CFA institute for centre for financial market
integrity also commented that, “different financial reporting standard result
in inconsistent delivery of information which does not meet the requirement of
the CBRM”. Investors loose decision the usefulness of the financial statement
as it cannot be compared with each other.This
essay
CONS
The IAS 19 requires the recognition of the pension
obligation in the financial statement using a required accounting this
statement companies have take reasonable a approach estimate employee pension
obligation. Various commentators opinion is that the requirement is a difficult
approach. ACCA global expressed the fact that user and producer of the
financial statements criticised the accounting requirements as it fails to
clear and complicated information about the post-employment benefits.
Understanding and the difficulty in producing the pension obligation could also
be one of the problem
faced by company. The IASB framework expects
information in the financial statement to be understandability. This therefore
poss a question on the understandability IAS 19 as the users and prepares feel
it does not give a clear approach in accounting.
ACCA global pointed at the [IAS 19.92-93 accounting
approach to pension recognition is a subjective assumption because the expected
return which is based on the market value is perceived to be expected loses.
This could be seen as an unrealiable measure market because the behaviours of
the market which determines the return.
“With no doubt the pension obligation are hard to
measure” (Rangecroft 39.269). Adpotation of the accounting standard means that
company has to company manage the pension plan as well as taking reasonable
approach manage the business risk attached to providing the pension obligation.
This therefore bring out the point at the providing pension obligation under
the IAS19 exposures the company to so many risk. (Koisse and Peasnell 39.256)
identified that the defined benefit pension plan posed the “risk of longevity,
interest rate, inflation and investment return on employer. The IAS 19 only
states how the plan obligation should be recognised but does not look into make
provision for company to protect them of the future risk involved.
Alternatives to reduce pension risk
Companies have gone through a rough period with the
requirement of IAS resulted in then taking varieties of other measure in other
to the reduce this risk. (Rangecroft 39.270) discussed the measure that had
been adopted by companies in other to reduce this risk which is to change
pension provision by closing plan, freezing plan and or reduced benefits. The
other alterative that has been adopted is to focus on managing risk; changed
cash strategy, integrated financial strategy, reduced asset-liability mismatch.
The survey carried out by defined benefit executives
also agrees which the alternative plan of managing risk . It states that senior
executives are begin to act on while some had already taking these alternative
measure. Other measure reflected on in the article is the adopting a more
conservative asset allocation and also increase contributions to the defined
benefit plans to meet defined benefit plan obligations in the near term/future.
These alternative has been reported to have help
companies effectively reduced its risk and more are more company are taking
this measure.
Tesco Plc publish that the implementation of the IAS
19 resulted in risk of the accounting valuation deficit would increase if the
return on corporate bonds is higher than the return on investment on the
pension assets. They considered the risk associated with the pension plan and
took action by adopting the investment strategy - contingency funding strategy
.
Conclusion
ACCA GLOBAL pointed out that the accounting for
post-employment benefits is an important financial reporting issue. It has been
suggested that many users of financial statements do not fully understand the
information that entities provide about post-employment benefits. Both users
and prepares of financial statement have criticised the accounting requirements
for failing to provide high quality, transparent information about
post-employment benefits.
No comments:
Post a Comment